Trust score
Likely trustworthy
In summary, irlaf.org is very likely not a scam but legit and reliable.
Overview
Key findings from our automated analysis.
- This website offers "get your money back" fri… This website offers "get your money back" friendly payment methods
- The SSL certificate is valid The SSL certificate is valid
- This website is This website is (very) old
- This website is safe according to DNSFilter This website is safe according to DNSFilter
- According to Tranco this site has a low rank According to Tranco this site has a low rank
Score by criteria
How each factor feeds into the overall rating.
Detailed analysis
Domain information
Ownership details for irlaf.org are masked behind a privacy service, which is common but makes the operator harder to hold to account.
- Created
- 17 November 2009
- Last updated
- 12 August 2026
- Renews
- 17 November 2026
- Registrant
- Redacted for privacy
Hosting & certificate
Where the site is served from, and who vouches for its encryption.
- Certificate issuer
- Let's Encrypt
- Validation level
- Domain Validated (DV)
- Certificate state
- Valid
- Response speed
- Fast
What the site presents
Content and metadata read from the page at scan time.
- Page title
- IRL Arts Foundation – Supporting families in agricultural communities and providing scholarships for students pursuing careers in food and agriculture.
What we flagged
These findings reduced the final score.
- Finding 1
- According to Tranco this site has a low rank
Analysis findings
What our scanner recorded, most significant first.
- According to Tranco this site has a low rank Caution
- This website offers "get your money back" friendly payment methods Positive
- The SSL certificate is valid Positive
Trust history
How the score moved over the past year.
Notable events
-
21 August 2026
Score: 100/100
Latest analysis
-
12 August 2026
WHOIS record updated
-
17 November 2009
Domain registered
Similar sites
Other .org domains that scored well.
How is this score calculated?
Our score draws on technical, reputational and behavioural signals gathered when we scanned the site. Each one is weighted by how much it affects safety and reliability. The final score runs from 0 to 100.